From here join the initiative last November 26 to 12 newspapers promoted by Catalan (El Periódico, La Vanguardia, El Punt, Avui, Segre, Diari de Tarragona, La Mañana, Diari de Girona, Regió 7, The Nou 9, Diari Diari de Sabadell and Terrassa). then the full text of editorial. After nearly three years of slow deliberation and continuous tactical skirmishes that have damaged the cohesion and eroded its prestige, the Constitutional Court may be about to deliver verdict on the Statute of Catalonia, promulgated on July 20, 2006 by the head of state, King Juan Carlos, with the following headline: "Be it known: That the Parliament has approved the citizens of Catalonia have been ratified in a referendum market and I hereby approve the following organic law." Be the first time since the democratic restoration in 1977 that the high court ruled on a fundamental law ratified by the voters. The expectation is high. The expectation is high and the concern is not limited to the evidence that the Court has been pushed by events to act as a fourth House, faced with the Catalan Parliament, the Parliament and the freely expressed will of citizens in polls. Again, this is an unprecedented situation in a democracy. There are, however, more concern. Of the 12 judges comprising the court may issue a 10 statement, since one of them (Pablo Pérez Tremps) is disqualified after a heavy move clearly aimed at changing the balance the debate, and one (Roberto García-Calvo) has died. Of the 10 judges eligible to vote, four remain in office after the expiry of its mandate, as a consequence of the sordid dispute between the government and the opposition on the renewal of a recently defined entity José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero as the "heart of democracy. " A heart valves with sealed, since only half of its members are now free from accident or extension. This is the court of appeal that is about to decide on the Statute of Catalonia. We respect the court-respect undoubtedly superior to that on several occasions this has shown itself, " will not further allude to the causes of delay in sentencing. Forward / reverse
The definition of Catalonia as a nation in the preamble of the Statute, with the resulting emanation of national symbols (did not recognize the Constitution, in Article 2, an integrated Spain regions and nationalities?), Right and duty to know the Catalan language, the articulation of the Judiciary in Catalunya, and the relationship between the State and the Government are, among others, the most obvious sticking points of the debate, according to versions of the same, since that a significant part of the court seems to be opting for uncompromising positions. Some people become dreaming of surgeries iron complex root curtail English. This could be, unfortunately, the touchstone of the sentence.
no mistake, the real dilemma is forward or backward, acceptance of the democratic maturity of a plural Spain, or blocking it. Not only are in play this or that article, at stake is the very dynamic constitutional spirit of 1977 that made possible the peaceful transition. There is reason for serious concern as it may be maturing a scheme to transform the sentence on the statute in a real institutional cerrojazo. A contrary to virtue castling maximum of the Constitution which is none other than its open and inclusive. The Constitutional Court therefore will not decide only on the lawsuit brought by the Popular Party against an organic law of the state (now PP reapproximated to Catalan society with constructive attitudes and flattering speeches.) The covenants require
The high court will decide on the actual size of the English framework of coexistence, that is, on the most important legacy that the people who live and staged a change of regime in the late 70's to transmit younger generation, educated in freedom, fully embedded in the complex European supranationalism and confronted the challenges of which date globalization stiffer seams of the old nation-state. At stake are profound agreements made possible by age 30 most virtuous of the history of Spain. And at this point is essential to recall one of the main spine of our legal system, rooted in Roman: pacta sunt servanda. The agreement requires.
There is concern in Catalonia and throughout Spain need to know. There is something more than concern. There is a growing weariness at having to endure the angry eyes of those who continue to receive the Catalan identity (institutions, economic structure, language and cultural tradition) and the manufacturing defect that prevents Spain reach an impossible dream and uniformity. The Catalans pay taxes (no statutory privilege); contribute their efforts to transfer income to the poorest Spain, facing economic globalization without substantial benefits from the state capital, speak a language with greater population than bellows several official languages \u200b\u200bin the European Union, a language, instead of being loved, is often subjected to obsessive scrutiny by the official English, and abide by the laws, of course, without giving up their peaceful and proven ability to hold civic . These days, the Catalans think, above all, their dignity should be known. We are on the eve of a very important decision. We hope that the constitutional decision in the circumstances of the case at hand, which is none other than the demand for improvement of an old self-European people, remembering that there is no absolute justice, only justice of the case , and therefore the legal basis for excellence is prudence. We return to remember: the statute is the result of a double political pact subject to a referendum. Catalan Solidarity
Make no mistake, or misunderstood the inevitable contradictions of current Catalunya. That no one misses the diagnosis, however many problems, disaffection and troubles. We are not facing a weak society, prostrate, ready to assist impassive to the impairment of its dignity. We do not wish to imply a negative outcome and trust in the probity of the judges, but anyone who knows Catalonia doubt that the recognition of identity, self improvement, obtaining financing and just a quantum leap in the management of infrastructure are and remain steadfastly claims raised a huge political and social support. If necessary Catalan solidarity will articulate the legitimate response from a responsible society.
My deepest thanks to those previously mented newspapers do muster the courage and put aside differences in a subject as sensitive as this.
Please show the world that sometimes we do things together well.
no mistake, the real dilemma is forward or backward, acceptance of the democratic maturity of a plural Spain, or blocking it. Not only are in play this or that article, at stake is the very dynamic constitutional spirit of 1977 that made possible the peaceful transition. There is reason for serious concern as it may be maturing a scheme to transform the sentence on the statute in a real institutional cerrojazo. A contrary to virtue castling maximum of the Constitution which is none other than its open and inclusive. The Constitutional Court therefore will not decide only on the lawsuit brought by the Popular Party against an organic law of the state (now PP reapproximated to Catalan society with constructive attitudes and flattering speeches.) The covenants require
The high court will decide on the actual size of the English framework of coexistence, that is, on the most important legacy that the people who live and staged a change of regime in the late 70's to transmit younger generation, educated in freedom, fully embedded in the complex European supranationalism and confronted the challenges of which date globalization stiffer seams of the old nation-state. At stake are profound agreements made possible by age 30 most virtuous of the history of Spain. And at this point is essential to recall one of the main spine of our legal system, rooted in Roman: pacta sunt servanda. The agreement requires.
There is concern in Catalonia and throughout Spain need to know. There is something more than concern. There is a growing weariness at having to endure the angry eyes of those who continue to receive the Catalan identity (institutions, economic structure, language and cultural tradition) and the manufacturing defect that prevents Spain reach an impossible dream and uniformity. The Catalans pay taxes (no statutory privilege); contribute their efforts to transfer income to the poorest Spain, facing economic globalization without substantial benefits from the state capital, speak a language with greater population than bellows several official languages \u200b\u200bin the European Union, a language, instead of being loved, is often subjected to obsessive scrutiny by the official English, and abide by the laws, of course, without giving up their peaceful and proven ability to hold civic . These days, the Catalans think, above all, their dignity should be known. We are on the eve of a very important decision. We hope that the constitutional decision in the circumstances of the case at hand, which is none other than the demand for improvement of an old self-European people, remembering that there is no absolute justice, only justice of the case , and therefore the legal basis for excellence is prudence. We return to remember: the statute is the result of a double political pact subject to a referendum. Catalan Solidarity
Make no mistake, or misunderstood the inevitable contradictions of current Catalunya. That no one misses the diagnosis, however many problems, disaffection and troubles. We are not facing a weak society, prostrate, ready to assist impassive to the impairment of its dignity. We do not wish to imply a negative outcome and trust in the probity of the judges, but anyone who knows Catalonia doubt that the recognition of identity, self improvement, obtaining financing and just a quantum leap in the management of infrastructure are and remain steadfastly claims raised a huge political and social support. If necessary Catalan solidarity will articulate the legitimate response from a responsible society.
My deepest thanks to those previously mented newspapers do muster the courage and put aside differences in a subject as sensitive as this.
Please show the world that sometimes we do things together well.
0 comments:
Post a Comment