PSOE did not expect the left-wing plan out of the crisis, but it was so right I really do not imagined. Zapatero This phrase says it all: " Now is when we most need it (the setting) to keep each other investors and maintain image stability." But what image of stability this man speaks? The stability is given by social cohesion and the courage of a / as citizens well informed and excited as / as a better future. But Zapatero and the PSOE could not care a damn. Its stability is that of the rich and image l to the deceptions. Not even the investor. For those who have money to invest do so if the citizenship of the country where you plan to be located is well formed, he wants to work, maintain internal solidarity and forward-looking lives. But Zapatero and the PSOE have taken away all that long ago. Right from the time they were laid in the hands of the banking and construction. Have you seen who have received with applause this plan? Entrepreneurs , banks , IMF (with its history of destroys-country) ...
Zapatero is not a leader. It is an undertaker of illusions and hopes. And in that spirit does not leave a country in a crisis.
Sorry that the main purpose of the adjustment are the / Do officials. A Zapatero lacks only say: "What are you going to pay ... for lazy / as." Delve into an undeserved image for 90% of those / workers. Regrettable. As unfortunate as to exploit the / as pensioners, weak part of our society. And if that were not enough, reduce the low contribution to the development of poorer countries. Measures of right-wing populism. Yes, with these measures arguably the PSOE won the elections again. Voters will vote him right: the PP, the NIP. Who wants to have a Zapatero Rajoy who hates the civil service and reducing contributions to "outsiders"?
Meanwhile, not redistribution, and innovation (that money now going to ask the Minister Garmendia ), training or anything. When will the recovery of the estate tax? When will the elevation of the maximum rate of income tax? Why raise a tax (VAT) that is particularly harmful to the middle and lower classes? Why only some learners may have to tighten their belts while other / as continue to enjoy their privileges and wealth? Have not been sufficient to 4.5 million unemployed, with 1.3 million families where nobody works, with 40% of the young people unemployed workers?
Besides, who can believe that an economy wakes up and VAT lowering the salaries of / officials that? That will only depress consumption and activity. Consequence: the moral decline to which I referred to earlier will join the economic downturn.
There is another way out of the crisis. From left, from the line with what most harshly pass from solidarity. Dividing the work and allowing each person to perform its valuable contribution. More equally distributed income to be the set of the population that drives the economy and not a / as little / as the same are here carried the dough to a tax haven. Has anyone shown that 10% of rich / as economy make it the remaining 90% of the population? Investing in training, innovation. Making bets for the future. But the PSOE, the PP, PNV and CiU are not in it. In the United Left parliamentary spectrum only believe in citizenship, in its ability to stand and fight for their future. Only the left, the left have said, is capable of leading a full recovery.
POST NOTE: you only have to read the reactions of different actors appear here published to get an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat we are talking about.
0 comments:
Post a Comment