Thursday, May 13, 2010

Columbus Ohio Waxing Gay

Joselu, making mischief

know me know that those who profess no particular fondness for José Luis Bilbao. So, I'll be delighted if not repeat as a member of Bizkaia in the next term. And you will think it's that lack of love that leads me to criticize their views. Not really. He wins all by himself to pulse. There is more to do his virulent rejection of the proposed railway from Bilbao-Castro that even his own party had to leave to correct him. Need to be anchored in the Middle Ages to defend a Euskadi isolated from the rest of the world as this man does. If something has done well Patxi López (slightly more, of course) has been closer ties with neighboring communities trying to identify what we have in common in order to progress together. And is that any other approach goes against the very interests of Euskadi.

Incidentally, Bilbao said that this PES do for their constituents. I am afraid that is wrong from beginning to end. Los / as Basques who have second homes in Castro or Laredo majority vote of the PNV. Los / as the PSE have a house (family) or Burgos Cáceres. And the / ace of EB do not have a second home, which gives them no big deal.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

лоликон топ 10

time is left. It is time the public. Damn

PSOE did not expect the left-wing plan out of the crisis, but it was so right I really do not imagined. Zapatero This phrase says it all: " Now is when we most need it (the setting) to keep each other investors and maintain image stability." But what image of stability this man speaks? The stability is given by social cohesion and the courage of a / as citizens well informed and excited as / as a better future. But Zapatero and the PSOE could not care a damn. Its stability is that of the rich and image l to the deceptions. Not even the investor. For those who have money to invest do so if the citizenship of the country where you plan to be located is well formed, he wants to work, maintain internal solidarity and forward-looking lives. But Zapatero and the PSOE have taken away all that long ago. Right from the time they were laid in the hands of the banking and construction. Have you seen who have received with applause this plan? Entrepreneurs , banks , IMF (with its history of destroys-country) ...


Zapatero is not a leader. It is an undertaker of illusions and hopes. And in that spirit does not leave a country in a crisis.


Sorry that the main purpose of the adjustment are the / Do officials. A Zapatero lacks only say: "What are you going to pay ... for lazy / as." Delve into an undeserved image for 90% of those / workers. Regrettable. As unfortunate as to exploit the / as pensioners, weak part of our society. And if that were not enough, reduce the low contribution to the development of poorer countries. Measures of right-wing populism. Yes, with these measures arguably the PSOE won the elections again. Voters will vote him right: the PP, the NIP. Who wants to have a Zapatero Rajoy who hates the civil service and reducing contributions to "outsiders"?


Meanwhile, not redistribution, and innovation (that money now going to ask the Minister Garmendia ), training or anything. When will the recovery of the estate tax? When will the elevation of the maximum rate of income tax? Why raise a tax (VAT) that is particularly harmful to the middle and lower classes? Why only some learners may have to tighten their belts while other / as continue to enjoy their privileges and wealth? Have not been sufficient to 4.5 million unemployed, with 1.3 million families where nobody works, with 40% of the young people unemployed workers?


Besides, who can believe that an economy wakes up and VAT lowering the salaries of / officials that? That will only depress consumption and activity. Consequence: the moral decline to which I referred to earlier will join the economic downturn.


There is another way out of the crisis. From left, from the line with what most harshly pass from solidarity. Dividing the work and allowing each person to perform its valuable contribution. More equally distributed income to be the set of the population that drives the economy and not a / as little / as the same are here carried the dough to a tax haven. Has anyone shown that 10% of rich / as economy make it the remaining 90% of the population? Investing in training, innovation. Making bets for the future. But the PSOE, the PP, PNV and CiU are not in it. In the United Left parliamentary spectrum only believe in citizenship, in its ability to stand and fight for their future. Only the left, the left have said, is capable of leading a full recovery.

POST NOTE: you only have to read the reactions of different actors appear here published to get an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat we are talking about.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

How Long Doyou Survive W Blockage In Intestines?



few days I've been thinking devastated the hardships imposed on the Greek population in the agreement for the "rescue" of that country and, therefore, I see absolutely justified the protests against the plan and against political class. We do not share is the use of violence that seems to have caused killed at least three people . Endanger the lives of people is not admissible in this type of protest and, besides causing irreparable harm to the families of the victims, harms the movement itself keeps them going. However, one should know the final version of the facts because the news I have is very recent.

The truth is I do not know much about the economy of Greece, but by what I read here , there and yonder seems borrowed to finance the Olympics, its military arsenal and other things in quantities that exceeded its capacity to generate wealth, which for years allowed the wealthy to avoid taxes or pay very small amounts, and that the corruption must be fairly widespread. The consequence of this is a deficit that has grown a lot (hardly a state may have a surplus if the tax charge has to charge) and a completely unsustainable debt.

And now it yourself some questions.

Who was financing for years now all consider this an outrage? Well, you certainly will not sorprendéis were mainly French and German banks. And obtained a higher return than that offered by other countries' bonds. A banks possibly have been buying debt until recently and now have pressured their governments to come to the rescue of Greece is not ultimately not charged on maturity, that about the limit. And who will pay in Europe this new bailout? Obviously, the entire citizenry.

Will Greece be able to return the loans will now receive and reconstruct the figure in the prescribed period of 3 years? After reading this and this (Inglés) and something else again My conclusion is clear: NO, IMPOSSIBLE. So great. Why? Because measures they have imposed the EU and the IMF in that country (VAT increase, reduction of wages of civil servants, higher taxes on fuel, snuff and alcohol), which will to do is depress consumption, reduce tax revenues and create more deficits. Of course, what Greece will do is to cancel the purchase of submarines and other military cachibaches is planned mainly to France and the U.S.. Is tricky. And what's worse: all this process which will no doubt be leading in the Greek population is a feeling of humiliation and helplessness that will not bring anything positive for the future. I guess those who voted last year Papandreou wondering how come this man and his government are making him the dirty work to the right of Karamanlis to which they thought they had defeated.

Ultimately, the plan will be a disaster for most of the Greek people will be impoverished while those who accumulated wealth in good years are not going to see harassed. How could it not to be angry with the Greek people?

Having seen, do not you think that had much better suspension payment by the Greek government and the renegotiation of debt with your creditors? Moreover, the blockade of the purchase of military hardware (and in place, negotiating a collaboration agreement with Turkey) would have an additional respite to the accounts. This, together with a sharing of the burden of fair recovery in which the rich paid a higher share (through taxes on high incomes and combating tax fraud) would have allowed the country out of this process with high face and can face the future in other conditions.

And now we come to Spain.

One For years we go into debt a lot (in our case mainly the private sector) in real estate transactions that squandered millions of euros in the construction of non-performing assets and unpayable. In the private sector rescue was the State which has borrowed a lot to fund million in nonperforming assets through E unfortunate and support plan for banks to weather the storm.

Two. Just before the crisis, were lowered taxes on the rich (by reducing personal income tax and estate tax elimination) and little or nothing has been done to prevent tax evasion.

Three. Corruption is also widespread in Spain.

Four. Also here is going to raise VAT and increased gasoline taxes, alcohol and snuff.

And five. Papandreou and Karamanlis, Zapatero-Rajoy. Do you distinguish?

Rajoy is right when he says that Zapatero is doing the same thing in Greece. Yes, and exactly what he had done. And just as do many European leaders. Damn Europe!

(the photos are aps)



2011 Hiv Test Sensitivity

Europe Vatican acts

Several recent events lead me to evaluate positively the late, but apparently decided, the Church's reaction to cases of child sexual abuse. First, the fact that has been suspended (or have resigned under pressure) to the bishops with responsibility for sexual abuse or concealment and were able to make those decisions publicly is a good start. These people can not further holding responsibilities in the Church and must be brought to justice, as says Benedict XVI will make . By the way, I think something should be done with the requirements of these crimes. Given the cultural change that has occurred, which now allows some complaints that were once unthinkable, I believe that justice should be able to investigate and rule on them even though they have spent more years than projected in the legislation.

On the other hand, action in the case of the Legionaries of Christ , including the public appreciation of its founder as offender and the involvement of that religious organization, is another sign that finally things are getting serious.

also published guidance on this matter at the very site of the Vatican (imagine that they will prove convenient to put on the cover this issue) is helping religious institutions initiate a complaint process I am convinced that will queue.

In short, even with many years of delay it seems that finally things are starting to do well.