Haircut Jeff Hardy 2011

fragmentary (II) (fiction Phonetics)

DGD: Landscape 3 (clonografía), 2001

* *

The etymology fiction

* The linguists call folk etymology is the origin of the words attributed to a collective wisdom guided less by the canonical rules for phonetic similarity. But how much truth is hidden in those games of imagination. The etymology is a phonetic-fiction fiction.

* *

*

Delirium etymological and painting

* Delirium etymological Bierce called it. No doubt, but something terrible is in the background when that delusion based on a life. A painter who was scandalized by the abundance of works of his contemporaries would say that a single painting could take years. To explain, he added: "In English, the first four letters of painting hold the key. Painting is pain, but you are painting the joy and because of that. No less true is that the painting depicts the pain and therefore in the most exalted moments, paint is the greatest suffering. "

* * *

Phonetics fiction (I)

*

An ocean of new possibilities, especially when different languages \u200b\u200bare interrelated with the ease and irresponsibility inventing stories. For example magnum, brotherhood phonetics of the French word désir (desire) and the English word mean . All that is desired. All I want is a say.

* * *

fiction Phonics (II)

*

Latin American popular speech uses a beautiful turn when it comes to minimize a claim, reducing it to mere boutade , "so to speak." Complete the phrase-that is, take it to extremes, is the boutade further, which almost means further truth: that is a whole say.

* * *

Phonetics fiction (III)

* No less worrisome is the quasi-phonetic identity of the English words look, luck and lock. Looking is a die cast. Luck is a closed watch. When the look is lucky, he finds before him a lock to be opened.

* * *

and censorship Sens

*

sens French and English censorship. Who does not sometimes feel that the senses are a censure of the world? In the same vein, the senses are said to capture the world, where there is only a step to say that I caught. Censoring and capture: atrocious verbs that are part of the rhetoric power. Because the meaning of meaning is not to restrict or punish, but rather the opposite. Perhaps nothing else gives the true sense.

* * *

Cara and charity

* Caritas

, altruistic love, is opposed to Eros, sensual love. Caritas is giving without expecting correspondence, while Eros is taking for me. The phonetic similarity between face emoticon and gives rise to imagine that the charity gives the face (da) while the hidden eroticism (removed). Caritas not expect correspondence, and That does not hide then give values \u200b\u200bto the unveiling, as does Eros, which is only waiting for correspondence. Charity is not only giving the face: hence it is a discredited word and almost one might say brazen. In its best moments, is to touch your face with your hands and skin.

* * *

Poem written in a dream

*

emeralds are also called eyes,
but the eyes are cloudy
whose eyelids are called heaven,
the curtain on the day where you paint or paint peeling
night
as a nude dancer
that has a name
different to when she is dressed,
and
look in the mirror and contemplates his eyes are sky
,
are clouds that are emeralds

* *

Asal Nama Deny Ramdan Yacob

Metaphor:

DGD: Landscapes-Blue Series 8 (clonografía), 2001

* *

Sooner or later every poet is posed the most difficult questions drawer, "What is poetry? ". The vast range of responses is equivalent to visiting a library and all records, from the academic solemnity to bloody mockery from naive ingenuity to more or less skillful reference that the respondent makes the best answers that you have read in the library.

* I once heard a certain American poet of the shorter answers: What you got? (literally: "What do you have?"). At first it seemed a brilliant resource, but sloppy, to get out on a tangent, but otherwise, the smile of the poet seemed to disarm the interviewer and he went on to another topic. It was not until some time after, in one of those tricks of memory, which usually brings to mind at least related to the circumstance, I suddenly remembered that phrase and also saw his own metaphorical. And is that perhaps the question "What is poetry?" Can be answered only in certain contexts, beyond which is nothing more than empty rhetoric, and always in relation to particular circumstances.

* happened in the "context" of a curious experiment made in a school of painting. As the culmination of an intense experience of examining the graph naive for a year, the workshop coordinator, Natalia, had asked his students to draw a landscape form as "innocent" as possible, as devoid of pre-existing mental formulas of clichés, automation of perception. Later I reviewed the results and showed them one by one: were landscapes, most cities or towns at the edge of the sea or rivers. It was obvious that in most cases the cartoonists had made efforts to "imitate" naive painters that had been discussed during that year, conventionally by breaking the laws of perspective, others had chosen to "look as much possible "to the child graphic. If these parts are carefully examined, it was almost possible note the intellect that was behind the "imitation." The pursuit of innocence could be considered successful only in certain passages in certain resolutions.

* "This is the only one about," said Natalia, and showed me a picture that at first glance I could not tell too much of others. I asked him why he did select it, and said: "It's simple: it is the only one who drew the horizon is not straight but curved."

*

was true: in all other cases the line separating the sky from the sea was straight, while the author or author this particular landscape had not only made the horizon curved, but concave, ie that the line had the shape of a "u". When he proposed the exercise, Natalia had no preconceived ideas, not told, for example "let's see how to draw the horizon" did not think beforehand that this was the "key" to see who had gone ahead in the year: only gave a comparison between different designs and, of course, a keen eye open. The context was the key itself.

* Was it that this poet had meant What you got? , something like "Give me your background and give you an answer does not conform to this particular context but its relation to other contexts." All artists, though they had "tried" to forget prejudices visual automatic schemes, laws of perspective, realism, visual, etc., nevertheless succumbed to the straight line as "intrinsic" horizon. Only one of the artists had achieved, perhaps unintentionally break the automatic implicitly, that idea made. Perhaps the American poet that I mean I would have said that picture was only possible to recognize the presence of poetry.

*

What you got? is also the question "What are your more common, fixed patterns that manipulate your perception of the world and dominate those he can not escape even if you intend to get rid of all the schemes?".

*

Conceivably, the result of that experience could be more rewarding for those who drew straight on the horizon, since that would make them aware of a scheme that had not been able to identify and overcome. For its part, the author or author of the drawing stated he had been able to break a pattern that revealed itself only when comparing the horizon with the other drawings, but also had given to other schemes. For example, had drawn the square houses and within square windows. "Has anyone ever made," Natalia asked, "paint a window inside houses, square or not?".

* Maybe when I asked why, what he was doing was to prolong the What you got? Because once assimilated by the perception, visual discovery of a curved horizon and the huge sway perceptual-provoking in turn became commonplace, scheme, capable of being used by someone who wanted "Imitate" the graph naive. Maybe that's why the answer to "What is poetry?" Only operative question may be another type What you got? , it emerges as a sufficiently illuminating the perceptual apparatus, which is a branch of rational-assimilates, adapts to it and add it as new schematic. Most likely this is also the Dadaists concerned when they said that a lifetime of pioneering work should not exceed five minutes.

*

With its clear counter-question, that poet was perhaps asserting that can only flow a response context and must be discarded immediately and move on, use it twice is to fall back into the scheme, ie the tree that hides the forest or, in other words, the answer rhetoric that hides the true miracle. What you got? is "Give me your context to find the exception, but once you have found this exception, you will confirm the rationality of the rule and will need to find a new one."

*

mobile context, constant flight preset mindset: perhaps the only possible answer, always moving, to what can be poetry.
*

*

Logitech Webcam Detect Model

fragmentary contexts and schemes (I)

DGD: Landscapes-Blue Series 22 (clonografía), 2009

* *
Gods
*

Likes gods that feed on blasphemy.

* * *

Passenger

* What a beautiful title of a collection of poems by Carlos Illescas: When travel is also pain passenger.

* *

* Originality

* often
We chose to define originality as the ability to originate new ideas. There is a lot of fallacy in it. Originality is not anything else you know to return to origins.

* * *

The fire dance
*
The fire never dance alone. Just look at the flames dancing in the shadows.

* * *

meditation * No

The great virtue of meditation is in suspend interior monologue (which is actually an inner dialogue), the very essence of identity, personality, ego. And if the interior monologue is what we are (since we are language, verbal, word chained to the other words), the great virtue of meditation lies in becoming Nobody. No, not the verbal, but suspended the river who embodies the silence behind it. No, not the street but that retraces the path to the Fiat lux. No, not the one who triggered the flow of the language but everything is rediscovering interior.

* * *

Amen and amen
*

A muffled prayer had always read religious understanding unaccented word usually crown, "Amen" as an exhortation that seemed worthy and up for everything else. When he realized that was exacerbated, "Amen," ultimately abandoned religion. No one could convince him, with or without an accent, meant more or less the same. Because he felt that the "so be it" was an individual will handle your case and add it to the collective desire to make the world as it is described in the laws and commandments.

* * *

Other analogies phonetic

* Well could this man have been arrested in another analogy phonics disturbing parasite paradise. O is in English: ice and eyes. In the first, am I a parasite in paradise?, "Is a parasite paradise in hell? The second: the world froze looking at it, stop the flow?, Is the visual reality is glacier, while the other senses do not require suspension for grasping?

* * *

even and odd

* "A greedy father, the prodigal son," says the proverb, so that we can imagine the prodigal grandfather was the grandson will be greedy. Children imitate their parents, but follow their grandparents, especially if the latter did not know. The worlds are in pairs, like the generations, as are the numbers: odd and even.

* * *

If I were (1)

* If only for me, just talk about dogs and metaphors.

* * *

If I had my way (2)

*

If I had my way If I had my
If
out of me If I was the outside of me

If I was the inside of me

* * *

company

Intangible

* Very rarely, being alone, I get rid of your company's intangible. That's why I love you and I want to be always with you: to finally get rid of you.

*

*